这部纪录片对希特勒掌权时期失去的自由进行了探讨,霹雳讲述 20 世纪 20 年代柏林一家光鲜亮丽的夜总会如何成为了酷儿群体的避风港。
这部纪录片对希特勒掌权时期失去的自由进行了探讨,霹雳讲述 20 世纪 20 年代柏林一家光鲜亮丽的夜总会如何成为了酷儿群体的避风港。
回复 :在英国小镇韦瑟比,琼组织了一次聚会,一位奇特的不请自来的青年被奉为上宾。第二天,这位不速之客又来了,在琼的面前开枪自杀而亡。案件对小镇震动很大。不久,真相大白于天下。原来那晚,这位失恋的青年在与琼发生关系后,又遭到琼的拒绝,痛苦之极走上不归路。本片是导演的低成本处女作,反映了他对人性的看法:平静下面潜藏着邪恶和欺诈,孤独时只能以扭曲的方式解脱自己。人们循规蹈矩地生活.直至陌生人暴力自杀,才给他们带来震动,这暗示了英国社会的等级及教育制度是人们反复无常的心理根源。影片表现了人的行为,以及人们产生这种行为的社会根源。本片具有深刻的思想性。反传统的表现手法使其有很强的艺术观赏性。本片获得1985年柏林电影节最佳故事片金熊奖。
回复 :高中少女桂木万里(原田知世 饰)5岁时,父亲(高桥幸宏 饰)曾向她描述一个美丽南太平洋小岛新喀里多尼亚,那是一个离天国最近的地方,当地的人民安居乐业,无忧无虑,宛如生活在仙境一般。父亲去世后,万里念念不忘与父亲共赴新喀里多尼亚的约定。她向母亲(松尾嘉代 饰)告别,独自踏上前往澳洲的旅程。几天的行程下来,万里发现新喀里多尼亚并非心中的那个小岛。之后他随假导游深谷有一(峰岸徹 饰)游历了伊尔德班;随第三代日本青年渡边太郎(高柳良一 饰)探访了乌维亚岛,但似乎都与父亲口中“离天国最近的小岛”相差甚远。万里留在这里的时间也越来越短……本片根据森村桂同名小说改编。
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb