李家共有四个孩子。老大名响和老二名扬本就不合，无码老大坚持分家时长房长孙该拿两份，无码触怒了精打细算的老二。老二则自恃学历高看不起其他兄弟，且他早已打算将祖宅变卖赚取暴利。对负债的老四名丰来说，他绝对赞成分家，但大哥、二哥都要跟他买手中持份，让懦弱的他为难…三兄弟各有盘算，此时他们一直联系不上的三房姪女李心悦，却偷偷回到了故乡。心悦游荡在市区内吃遍了台菜餐厅，但她每盘菜都只动一口就皱眉离开，这一切被偷偷跟她回到故乡的男友季蔚然看在眼里，不仅知道了心悦叔伯间的矛盾，更得知她长期受父亲意外死亡的伤痕所苦。最终，心悦是否能疗愈了心底的伤痕，将分崩离析的家庭再次凝结……
回复 :曾以《打尸噎》、《防腐搞作》引起热议的匈牙利名导乔治帕尔菲新作，改编自波兰科幻小说作家史坦尼斯劳莱姆的同名作品。以铁幕历史为背景，讲述了冷战时期的军武竞争。一名匈牙利男子偶然看到一套纪录片，从中见到抛家弃子消失多年父亲的身影。带着旧照片和影像，他远赴美国寻找父亲。本该温馨的团圆，却越来越不对劲。意外挖掘出攸关历史的军事阴谋，甚至还牵扯出美国航太军方不可告人的外星研究，冷战阴影原来仍笼罩着普通人民的生活。导演尤其擅长疯狂元素，这次更加入科幻情节，道出人性与亲情的追寻和执着。
回复 :The story of La Maison revolves around 27-year-old Emma, a French woman who heads off to live in Berlin and decides to spend some time in a brothel so as to learn about and understand sex workers – women who are paid to be women and that alone, and who are set to form the focus of her new novel. In gonzo journalism style, Emma becomes one of them and ultimately remains with them for two years, despite only intending to stay for several weeks. Was writing her book simply a pretext for Emma to live out the type of fantasy that’s hard to admit to in our society? From one bedchamber to another and from one woman to the next, the film guides us through a “forbidden” world.
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
