江文淵的都市造山，无敌爹如何在不可避免的集居年代，无敌爹依然不與自然斷裂，考驗著建築師對精神向度的追求與技術的突破。廖偉立的建築作品，我們發現了駁雜又現代的台灣，為台灣的混亂找到看法，為聖俗共存找到可能性。在黃聲遠的帶領，我們發現建築師可以如此具有社會性。他不願意讓建築淪為商業操作來服務少數人，因此無論是大棚架系列、維管束系列，黃聲遠都渴望為不同的社會階層留下各種可能性。心的寧靜與安定，一直是曾志偉長期追尋的方向，因此他具實驗性的、挑戰常軌的建築，為的就是期待人們能感受到自然所帶來的療癒及安定。
回复 :Strike是一名19岁的黑人青年。他是一个Clocker。Clocker是人们对毒品销售链条中最低一级的称呼，他们负责全天候在街头巷尾游荡兜售小剂量毒品。Strike做梦都想摆脱这样的生活。Strike的老板，毒贩Rodney让Strike除掉吃水颇深的另一个Clocker：Darryl。并应允事成之后将Strike升职。Darryl按计划被杀了，Strike兄弟Victor试图为其顶罪，但Strike最终成为了最大的嫌疑人，警察Klein却认为这个案子后面另有隐情，决心找出真相……
回复 :Thea, Rene's wife, always invites her other man, Geoff, over dinner for them to make out in the house. But when a new woman, Camille, enters the picture, Thea's wild and crazy game play changes.
回复 :2018年5月和6月，Jean Gabriel P_Riot与位于Ivry Sur Seine的一所高中的10名电影班学生合作，开展了一项将电影与政治结合起来的项目。学生们在摄像机前和摄像机后工作，重新布置罢工、抵抗和劳资纠纷的场景，这些电影可以追溯到20世纪60年代末到70年代末，包括让-卢克-戈达尔和阿兰-坦纳的电影。nos d_faites汇集了调查结果，并增加了采访，在采访中，导演询问学生他们刚刚表演的场景，关于“阶级”、“工会”和“政治参与”等概念，以及更广泛的社会背景。这是一个简单，但尖锐的设置，让观众一瞥年轻一代如何看待政治和过去的政治电影。这部影片还记录了导演试图激怒学生的企图。在导演和学生似乎处于平等地位的遭遇中，基于从未见过的导演更多类似于老师的提问，以及此时此刻对革命的思考：起义的表现反映了同样的情况。这会导致一个真实的发生吗？In May and June 2018, Jean-Gabriel Périot collaborated with ten students in a film class at a high school in Ivry-sur-Seine on a project that unites cinema with politics. The students worked both in front of and behind the camera, restaging scenes of strikes, resistance, and labour disputes from films dating from the late 1960s to the late 1970s, including ones by Jean-Luc Godard and Alain Tanner. Nos défaites assembles the results, and adds interviews in which the director queries the students about the scenes they’ve just acted in, about such concepts as “class,” “labour union,” and “political engagement,” about wider social contexts. It’s a simple, yet trenchant setup, affording viewers a glimpse of how a younger generation sees politics and the political cinema of the past. The film also documents the director’s attempts to stir up the students. The conversations vary between encounters in which director and students seem on an equal footing, based on more teacher-like questioning by the never-visible director, and contemplations of revolution in the here and now: the performance of an uprising follows reflection upon the same. Could this lead to one happening for real?回到1968年的电影时代，继续对重放从过去跳出来的电影节选的年轻人进行今天的采访，我们的失败描绘了我们当前与政治的关系。我们的失败，还是我们有足够的力量来面对今天的混乱？By going back into the cinema of the 1968 era and going forward with present-day interviews of young people who replay excerpts of film s jumping out from the past, Our Defeats draw the portrait of our current relations with politics. Our Defeats, or do we keep enough forces to confront ourselves with the chaos of today?
